Poor Childrens' Exposure to Neighborhood Foreign-Born Presence by Race/Ethnicity

Year: 2000; Race/Ethnicity: All; Ordered: alphabetically; Region: 100 Largest MSAs

Why don’t my MSA choices always appear consistently across all reports?

Scale Range: 0.8% – 50.4%

1: Akron, OH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.6%
Hispanic	–
Black	2.5%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

2: Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.1%
Hispanic	6.6%
Black	7.4%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

3: Albuquerque, NM	Value
Non-Hispanic White	7.3%
Hispanic	13.2%
Black	–
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

4: Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ	Value
Non-Hispanic White	5.3%
Hispanic	9.1%
Black	9.1%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

5: Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	7.3%
Hispanic	25.4%
Black	7.6%
Asian/Pacific Islander	24.1%

6: Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.7%
Hispanic	–
Black	1.8%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

7: Austin-Round Rock, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	10.6%
Hispanic	19.9%
Black	18.1%
Asian/Pacific Islander	19.5%

8: Bakersfield, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	11.8%
Hispanic	28.8%
Black	19.7%
Asian/Pacific Islander	26.2%

9: Baltimore-Towson, MD	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.9%
Hispanic	8.8%
Black	3.6%
Asian/Pacific Islander	10.4%

10: Baton Rouge, LA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.8%
Hispanic	–
Black	1.8%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

11: Birmingham-Hoover, AL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.4%
Hispanic	4.6%
Black	1.3%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

12: Boise City-Nampa, ID	Value
Non-Hispanic White	6.3%
Hispanic	10.7%
Black	–
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

13: Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	13.1%
Hispanic	28.3%
Black	26.3%
Asian/Pacific Islander	28.6%

14: Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	17.4%
Hispanic	23.2%
Black	21.7%
Asian/Pacific Islander	18.8%

15: Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Tonawanda, NY	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.4%
Hispanic	6.3%
Black	3.6%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

16: Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	8.5%
Hispanic	13.6%
Black	10.8%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

17: Charleston-North Charleston, SC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.5%
Hispanic	–
Black	2.8%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

18: Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	5.5%
Hispanic	16.1%
Black	7.9%
Asian/Pacific Islander	11.0%

19: Chattanooga, TN-GA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.1%
Hispanic	–
Black	2.5%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

20: Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	16.0%
Hispanic	34.2%
Black	6.1%
Asian/Pacific Islander	34.8%

21: Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.9%
Hispanic	3.2%
Black	2.5%
Asian/Pacific Islander	5.9%

22: Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	5.5%
Hispanic	5.7%
Black	2.4%
Asian/Pacific Islander	8.4%

23: Colorado Springs, CO	Value
Non-Hispanic White	6.3%
Hispanic	8.7%
Black	9.1%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

24: Columbia, SC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.9%
Hispanic	–
Black	2.6%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

25: Columbus, OH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.3%
Hispanic	10.2%
Black	5.4%
Asian/Pacific Islander	10.1%

26: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	11.9%
Hispanic	30.8%
Black	14.9%
Asian/Pacific Islander	22.3%

27: Dayton, OH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.3%
Hispanic	–
Black	1.3%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

28: Denver-Aurora, CO	Value
Non-Hispanic White	10.7%
Hispanic	23.8%
Black	21.0%
Asian/Pacific Islander	16.3%

29: Des Moines, IA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	5.8%
Hispanic	13.1%
Black	14.6%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

30: Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	12.2%
Hispanic	17.3%
Black	3.3%
Asian/Pacific Islander	17.0%

31: El Paso, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	24.7%
Hispanic	32.1%
Black	23.2%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

32: Fresno, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	18.5%
Hispanic	30.4%
Black	24.5%
Asian/Pacific Islander	27.3%

33: Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.8%
Hispanic	17.7%
Black	11.0%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

34: Greensboro-High Point, NC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.9%
Hispanic	10.3%
Black	6.3%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

35: Greenville, SC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.5%
Hispanic	–
Black	3.5%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

36: Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.6%
Hispanic	5.5%
Black	4.7%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

37: Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	9.9%
Hispanic	16.2%
Black	15.5%
Asian/Pacific Islander	13.6%

38: Honolulu, HI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	13.8%
Hispanic	18.1%
Black	14.4%
Asian/Pacific Islander	24.7%

39: Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	14.6%
Hispanic	30.9%
Black	16.8%
Asian/Pacific Islander	29.0%

40: Indianapolis, IN	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.3%
Hispanic	7.5%
Black	4.0%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

41: Jackson, MS	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.4%
Hispanic	–
Black	0.8%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

42: Jacksonville, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.6%
Hispanic	6.0%
Black	3.4%
Asian/Pacific Islander	8.9%

43: Kansas City, MO-KS	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.7%
Hispanic	15.3%
Black	6.2%
Asian/Pacific Islander	12.6%

44: Knoxville, TN	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.9%
Hispanic	–
Black	1.8%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

45: Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	7.1%
Hispanic	11.6%
Black	6.7%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

46: Lancaster, PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.6%
Hispanic	5.7%
Black	–
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

47: Las Vegas-Paradise, NV	Value
Non-Hispanic White	17.5%
Hispanic	32.4%
Black	23.4%
Asian/Pacific Islander	20.8%

48: Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.8%
Hispanic	–
Black	2.5%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

49: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	33.4%
Hispanic	45.9%
Black	33.0%
Asian/Pacific Islander	45.0%

50: Louisville, KY-IN	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.3%
Hispanic	6.3%
Black	2.0%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

51: Madison, WI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.9%
Hispanic	–
Black	11.5%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

52: McAllen-Edinburg-Pharr, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	28.6%
Hispanic	32.1%
Black	–
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

53: Memphis, TN-MS-AR	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.9%
Hispanic	6.8%
Black	2.1%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

54: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	35.4%
Hispanic	50.4%
Black	27.6%
Asian/Pacific Islander	33.2%

55: Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	6.1%
Hispanic	20.9%
Black	4.4%
Asian/Pacific Islander	12.7%

56: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	6.5%
Hispanic	16.3%
Black	18.0%
Asian/Pacific Islander	21.7%

57: Modesto, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	18.5%
Hispanic	23.9%
Black	–
Asian/Pacific Islander	24.3%

58: Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro, TN	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.9%
Hispanic	11.6%
Black	3.8%
Asian/Pacific Islander	8.7%

59: New Haven-Milford, CT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	9.8%
Hispanic	11.4%
Black	10.6%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

60: New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.8%
Hispanic	8.1%
Black	3.5%
Asian/Pacific Islander	13.3%

61: New York-Newark-Edison, NY-NJ-PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	26.1%
Hispanic	35.4%
Black	27.1%
Asian/Pacific Islander	47.6%

62: Ogden-Clearfield, UT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	6.1%
Hispanic	14.1%
Black	–
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

63: Oklahoma City, OK	Value
Non-Hispanic White	6.2%
Hispanic	15.6%
Black	6.3%
Asian/Pacific Islander	13.0%

64: Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.9%
Hispanic	16.3%
Black	4.7%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

65: Orlando, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	10.8%
Hispanic	15.9%
Black	12.7%
Asian/Pacific Islander	17.6%

66: Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	17.1%
Hispanic	33.8%
Black	–
Asian/Pacific Islander	29.0%

67: Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	6.3%
Hispanic	7.3%
Black	5.5%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

68: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD	Value
Non-Hispanic White	7.4%
Hispanic	8.5%
Black	5.6%
Asian/Pacific Islander	16.2%

69: Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ	Value
Non-Hispanic White	14.4%
Hispanic	28.6%
Black	24.6%
Asian/Pacific Islander	20.4%

70: Pittsburgh, PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.7%
Hispanic	2.4%
Black	1.8%
Asian/Pacific Islander	8.4%

71: Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	11.5%
Hispanic	17.0%
Black	14.0%
Asian/Pacific Islander	14.9%

72: Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY	Value
Non-Hispanic White	8.4%
Hispanic	15.0%
Black	15.8%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

73: Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	14.0%
Hispanic	26.4%
Black	23.6%
Asian/Pacific Islander	26.7%

74: Provo-Orem, UT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	6.9%
Hispanic	11.0%
Black	–
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

75: Raleigh-Cary, NC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	7.2%
Hispanic	10.2%
Black	8.1%
Asian/Pacific Islander	12.1%

76: Richmond, VA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.1%
Hispanic	7.3%
Black	2.6%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

77: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	15.9%
Hispanic	26.7%
Black	21.1%
Asian/Pacific Islander	22.7%

78: Rochester, NY	Value
Non-Hispanic White	5.0%
Hispanic	7.0%
Black	6.3%
Asian/Pacific Islander	9.6%

79: Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	16.3%
Hispanic	22.7%
Black	22.5%
Asian/Pacific Islander	26.4%

80: Salt Lake City, UT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	11.2%
Hispanic	21.6%
Black	–
Asian/Pacific Islander	18.0%

81: San Antonio, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	8.0%
Hispanic	13.4%
Black	10.2%
Asian/Pacific Islander	9.3%

82: San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	18.1%
Hispanic	35.0%
Black	31.6%
Asian/Pacific Islander	34.9%

83: San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	23.3%
Hispanic	35.6%
Black	25.7%
Asian/Pacific Islander	38.6%

84: San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	29.9%
Hispanic	41.2%
Black	38.6%
Asian/Pacific Islander	44.6%

85: Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	9.8%
Hispanic	15.4%
Black	12.1%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

86: Scranton-Wilkes-Barre, PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.0%
Hispanic	–
Black	–
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

87: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	11.9%
Hispanic	17.3%
Black	19.1%
Asian/Pacific Islander	23.4%

88: Springfield, MA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	7.7%
Hispanic	7.3%
Black	8.1%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

89: St. Louis, MO-IL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.7%
Hispanic	5.8%
Black	2.3%
Asian/Pacific Islander	7.6%

90: Stockton, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	19.5%
Hispanic	26.9%
Black	26.5%
Asian/Pacific Islander	29.4%

91: Syracuse, NY	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.0%
Hispanic	5.0%
Black	5.2%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

92: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	8.8%
Hispanic	15.4%
Black	8.6%
Asian/Pacific Islander	12.0%

93: Toledo, OH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.7%
Hispanic	2.8%
Black	2.4%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

94: Tucson, AZ	Value
Non-Hispanic White	11.9%
Hispanic	21.0%
Black	16.5%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

95: Tulsa, OK	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.3%
Hispanic	8.4%
Black	4.5%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

96: Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.5%
Hispanic	5.2%
Black	2.7%
Asian/Pacific Islander	7.0%

97: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV	Value
Non-Hispanic White	13.5%
Hispanic	34.2%
Black	11.1%
Asian/Pacific Islander	31.7%

98: Wichita, KS	Value
Non-Hispanic White	5.5%
Hispanic	16.5%
Black	10.3%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

99: Worcester, MA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	8.6%
Hispanic	13.6%
Black	14.2%
Asian/Pacific Islander	16.4%

100: Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.6%
Hispanic	–
Black	1.5%
Asian/Pacific Islander	–

Definition: This indicator provides the foreign-born share of the population in the neighborhood where the average poor child of different racial/ethnic groups lives. For instance, if the value is 10% for poor Hispanic children, this statistic is interpreted as "The average poor Hispanic child in this metro area lives in a neighborhood where the foreign-born share of the population is 10%."

Notes: Poverty rates defined as of 1999. Children are defined as under 18. Excludes metro areas with less than 5,000 child population of the specified racial/ethnic group.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census, Summary File 3.