Childrens' Exposure to Neighborhoods with Crowded Housing by Race/Ethnicity

Year: 2000; Race/Ethnicity: All; Ordered: alphabetically; Region: 100 Largest MSAs

Why don’t my MSA choices always appear consistently across all reports?

Scale Range: 0.8% – 38.5%

1: Akron, OH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.2%
Hispanic	–
Non-Hispanic Black	2.3%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

2: Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.2%
Hispanic	2.4%
Non-Hispanic Black	3.3%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

3: Albuquerque, NM	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.0%
Hispanic	8.1%
Non-Hispanic Black	–
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

4: Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.2%
Hispanic	5.1%
Non-Hispanic Black	3.8%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

5: Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.0%
Hispanic	9.8%
Non-Hispanic Black	7.8%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	6.7%

6: Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.1%
Hispanic	–
Non-Hispanic Black	5.2%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

7: Austin-Round Rock, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.5%
Hispanic	12.5%
Non-Hispanic Black	12.6%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	5.2%

8: Bakersfield, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	9.6%
Hispanic	27.1%
Non-Hispanic Black	18.7%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	20.1%

9: Baltimore-Towson, MD	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.7%
Hispanic	3.1%
Non-Hispanic Black	4.8%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	2.4%

10: Baton Rouge, LA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.9%
Hispanic	–
Non-Hispanic Black	7.6%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

11: Birmingham-Hoover, AL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.9%
Hispanic	3.3%
Non-Hispanic Black	4.1%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

12: Boise City-Nampa, ID	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.4%
Hispanic	7.6%
Non-Hispanic Black	–
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

13: Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.8%
Hispanic	9.3%
Non-Hispanic Black	8.0%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	6.0%

14: Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.6%
Hispanic	9.2%
Non-Hispanic Black	9.2%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	4.4%

15: Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Tonawanda, NY	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.3%
Hispanic	4.5%
Non-Hispanic Black	3.7%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

16: Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.4%
Hispanic	7.4%
Non-Hispanic Black	10.3%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

17: Charleston-North Charleston, SC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.9%
Hispanic	–
Non-Hispanic Black	4.8%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

18: Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.6%
Hispanic	7.2%
Non-Hispanic Black	6.9%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	4.6%

19: Chattanooga, TN-GA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.8%
Hispanic	–
Non-Hispanic Black	3.9%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

20: Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.3%
Hispanic	15.3%
Non-Hispanic Black	9.7%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	7.0%

21: Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.5%
Hispanic	2.1%
Non-Hispanic Black	3.6%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	1.5%

22: Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.3%
Hispanic	3.7%
Non-Hispanic Black	3.1%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	1.5%

23: Colorado Springs, CO	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.1%
Hispanic	5.2%
Non-Hispanic Black	5.7%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

24: Columbia, SC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.3%
Hispanic	–
Non-Hispanic Black	4.1%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

25: Columbus, OH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.6%
Hispanic	3.2%
Non-Hispanic Black	4.0%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	2.2%

26: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	5.5%
Hispanic	19.3%
Non-Hispanic Black	12.4%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	8.4%

27: Dayton, OH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.3%
Hispanic	–
Non-Hispanic Black	2.6%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

28: Denver-Aurora, CO	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.2%
Hispanic	11.6%
Non-Hispanic Black	10.0%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	5.3%

29: Des Moines, IA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.5%
Hispanic	6.2%
Non-Hispanic Black	8.0%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

30: Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.6%
Hispanic	6.9%
Non-Hispanic Black	7.3%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	4.1%

31: El Paso, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	10.1%
Hispanic	16.3%
Non-Hispanic Black	11.8%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

32: Fresno, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	10.9%
Hispanic	27.0%
Non-Hispanic Black	21.6%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	24.3%

33: Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.5%
Hispanic	8.8%
Non-Hispanic Black	6.3%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

34: Greensboro-High Point, NC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.6%
Hispanic	5.5%
Non-Hispanic Black	4.9%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

35: Greenville, SC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.3%
Hispanic	–
Non-Hispanic Black	3.3%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

36: Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.3%
Hispanic	4.3%
Non-Hispanic Black	4.4%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

37: Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.3%
Hispanic	8.0%
Non-Hispanic Black	6.2%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	2.3%

38: Honolulu, HI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	10.8%
Hispanic	18.3%
Non-Hispanic Black	11.4%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	20.1%

39: Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	6.5%
Hispanic	19.4%
Non-Hispanic Black	14.6%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	10.9%

40: Indianapolis, IN	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.8%
Hispanic	3.9%
Non-Hispanic Black	4.8%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

41: Jackson, MS	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.7%
Hispanic	–
Non-Hispanic Black	8.4%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

42: Jacksonville, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.4%
Hispanic	4.2%
Non-Hispanic Black	6.6%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	3.8%

43: Kansas City, MO-KS	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.1%
Hispanic	6.5%
Non-Hispanic Black	5.5%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	4.0%

44: Knoxville, TN	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.4%
Hispanic	–
Non-Hispanic Black	2.8%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

45: Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.6%
Hispanic	8.4%
Non-Hispanic Black	7.3%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

46: Lancaster, PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.0%
Hispanic	5.4%
Non-Hispanic Black	–
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

47: Las Vegas-Paradise, NV	Value
Non-Hispanic White	6.7%
Hispanic	17.5%
Non-Hispanic Black	14.1%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	8.5%

48: Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.6%
Hispanic	–
Non-Hispanic Black	5.4%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

49: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	11.3%
Hispanic	38.5%
Non-Hispanic Black	28.3%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	22.4%

50: Louisville, KY-IN	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.8%
Hispanic	3.0%
Non-Hispanic Black	4.4%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

51: Madison, WI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.9%
Hispanic	–
Non-Hispanic Black	5.7%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

52: McAllen-Edinburg-Pharr, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	17.7%
Hispanic	27.2%
Non-Hispanic Black	–
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

53: Memphis, TN-MS-AR	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.7%
Hispanic	5.9%
Non-Hispanic Black	7.6%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

54: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	8.2%
Hispanic	18.5%
Non-Hispanic Black	19.1%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	9.9%

55: Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.8%
Hispanic	10.6%
Non-Hispanic Black	7.9%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	7.1%

56: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.3%
Hispanic	7.7%
Non-Hispanic Black	10.6%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	9.8%

57: Modesto, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	12.5%
Hispanic	20.4%
Non-Hispanic Black	–
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	18.4%

58: Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro, TN	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.3%
Hispanic	4.9%
Non-Hispanic Black	5.4%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	3.6%

59: New Haven-Milford, CT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.6%
Hispanic	6.2%
Non-Hispanic Black	5.9%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

60: New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.6%
Hispanic	6.2%
Non-Hispanic Black	9.8%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	9.8%

61: New York-Newark-Edison, NY-NJ-PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.7%
Hispanic	18.3%
Non-Hispanic Black	14.6%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	13.1%

62: Ogden-Clearfield, UT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.5%
Hispanic	8.6%
Non-Hispanic Black	–
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

63: Oklahoma City, OK	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.4%
Hispanic	8.4%
Non-Hispanic Black	5.5%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	4.1%

64: Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.2%
Hispanic	6.6%
Non-Hispanic Black	5.8%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

65: Orlando, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.4%
Hispanic	8.2%
Non-Hispanic Black	9.5%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	6.0%

66: Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	7.1%
Hispanic	27.2%
Non-Hispanic Black	–
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	13.6%

67: Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.4%
Hispanic	3.0%
Non-Hispanic Black	5.0%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

68: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.8%
Hispanic	9.4%
Non-Hispanic Black	6.1%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	4.8%

69: Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ	Value
Non-Hispanic White	6.0%
Hispanic	19.4%
Non-Hispanic Black	15.3%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	7.1%

70: Pittsburgh, PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	0.9%
Hispanic	1.2%
Non-Hispanic Black	2.2%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	1.1%

71: Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.6%
Hispanic	8.1%
Non-Hispanic Black	6.8%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	5.5%

72: Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.2%
Hispanic	6.9%
Non-Hispanic Black	7.3%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

73: Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.8%
Hispanic	8.2%
Non-Hispanic Black	6.8%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	6.2%

74: Provo-Orem, UT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	5.9%
Hispanic	8.9%
Non-Hispanic Black	–
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

75: Raleigh-Cary, NC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.4%
Hispanic	4.6%
Non-Hispanic Black	4.9%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	2.7%

76: Richmond, VA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.5%
Hispanic	3.4%
Non-Hispanic Black	4.0%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

77: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	10.4%
Hispanic	21.7%
Non-Hispanic Black	17.9%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	13.0%

78: Rochester, NY	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.3%
Hispanic	3.9%
Non-Hispanic Black	4.1%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	2.0%

79: Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	6.4%
Hispanic	13.1%
Non-Hispanic Black	14.4%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	14.1%

80: Salt Lake City, UT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.9%
Hispanic	10.2%
Non-Hispanic Black	–
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	8.9%

81: San Antonio, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	5.4%
Hispanic	13.2%
Non-Hispanic Black	9.0%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	5.8%

82: San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	7.9%
Hispanic	23.8%
Non-Hispanic Black	20.9%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	17.0%

83: San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	6.2%
Hispanic	20.8%
Non-Hispanic Black	18.3%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	15.1%

84: San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	9.3%
Hispanic	27.1%
Non-Hispanic Black	19.8%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	18.4%

85: Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.8%
Hispanic	9.4%
Non-Hispanic Black	11.3%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

86: Scranton-Wilkes-Barre, PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	0.8%
Hispanic	–
Non-Hispanic Black	–
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

87: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.1%
Hispanic	7.1%
Non-Hispanic Black	8.5%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	7.4%

88: Springfield, MA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.8%
Hispanic	7.9%
Non-Hispanic Black	5.8%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

89: St. Louis, MO-IL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.8%
Hispanic	3.1%
Non-Hispanic Black	5.1%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	2.3%

90: Stockton, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	10.6%
Hispanic	18.9%
Non-Hispanic Black	19.5%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	20.7%

91: Syracuse, NY	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.4%
Hispanic	3.3%
Non-Hispanic Black	4.2%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

92: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.4%
Hispanic	8.0%
Non-Hispanic Black	9.0%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	4.2%

93: Toledo, OH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.4%
Hispanic	2.3%
Non-Hispanic Black	3.2%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

94: Tucson, AZ	Value
Non-Hispanic White	5.1%
Hispanic	13.1%
Non-Hispanic Black	9.8%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

95: Tulsa, OK	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.2%
Hispanic	6.1%
Non-Hispanic Black	6.2%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

96: Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.6%
Hispanic	3.9%
Non-Hispanic Black	5.1%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	3.4%

97: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.0%
Hispanic	11.2%
Non-Hispanic Black	8.5%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	6.4%

98: Wichita, KS	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.9%
Hispanic	7.5%
Non-Hispanic Black	5.9%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

99: Worcester, MA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.6%
Hispanic	5.8%
Non-Hispanic Black	4.7%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	3.6%

100: Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.4%
Hispanic	–
Non-Hispanic Black	2.4%
Non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander	–

Definition: This indicator provides the share of occupied housing units that are crowded in the neighborhood where the average child of different racial/ethnic groups lives. For instance, if the value is 10% for Hispanic children, this statistic is interpreted as "The average Hispanic child in this metro area lives in a neighborhood where 10% of occupied housing units are crowded."

Notes: Children defined as under 18. Crowding defined as more than one person per room. Excludes metro areas with less than 5,000 child population of the specified racial/ethnic group.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census, Summary File 3 accessed through the Neighborhood Change Database. U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census, Summary File 1.