Share of Women With Children at Home in the Labor Force - Rankings - diversitydata.org - data for diverse and equitable metropolitan areas

Share of Women With Children at Home in the Labor Force

Year: 2000; Ordered: alphabetically; Region: 100 Largest MSAs

Why don’t my MSA choices always appear consistently across all reports?

Year

Sort Order

Sort Options

High to Low
Low to High
Top 10/Bottom 10

Select Regions

Largest 100 Metro Areas
All 362 Metro Areas
Select Custom Metro Areas

Notes and Sources

Show

Go to Indicator definition

Scale Range: 46.0% – 76.0%

	Value
1: Akron, OH	69.0%
2: Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY	70.0%
3: Albuquerque, NM	61.0%
4: Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ	67.0%
5: Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA	62.0%
6: Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC	65.0%
7: Austin-Round Rock, TX	61.0%
8: Bakersfield, CA	55.0%
9: Baltimore-Towson, MD	69.0%
10: Baton Rouge, LA	65.0%
11: Birmingham-Hoover, AL	62.0%
12: Boise City-Nampa, ID	63.0%
13: Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH	65.0%
14: Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT	59.0%
15: Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Tonawanda, NY	70.0%
16: Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL	66.0%
17: Charleston-North Charleston, SC	67.0%
18: Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC	64.0%
19: Chattanooga, TN-GA	62.0%
20: Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI	61.0%
21: Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN	67.0%
22: Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH	66.0%
23: Colorado Springs, CO	63.0%
24: Columbia, SC	69.0%
25: Columbus, OH	68.0%
26: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX	60.0%
27: Dayton, OH	70.0%
28: Denver-Aurora, CO	64.0%
29: Des Moines, IA	76.0%
30: Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI	62.0%
31: El Paso, TX	54.0%
32: Fresno, CA	56.0%
33: Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI	67.0%
34: Greensboro-High Point, NC	68.0%
35: Greenville, SC	65.0%
36: Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA	70.0%
37: Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT	69.0%
38: Honolulu, HI	62.0%
39: Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX	56.0%
40: Indianapolis, IN	69.0%
41: Jackson, MS	70.0%
42: Jacksonville, FL	66.0%
43: Kansas City, MO-KS	67.0%
44: Knoxville, TN	64.0%
45: Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL	67.0%
46: Lancaster, PA	63.0%
47: Las Vegas-Paradise, NV	61.0%
48: Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR	67.0%
49: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA	55.0%
50: Louisville, KY-IN	70.0%
51: Madison, WI	75.0%
52: McAllen-Edinburg-Pharr, TX	46.0%
53: Memphis, TN-MS-AR	66.0%
54: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach, FL	63.0%
55: Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI	69.0%
56: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI	72.0%
57: Modesto, CA	58.0%
58: Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro, TN	64.0%
59: New Haven-Milford, CT	69.0%
60: New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA	66.0%
61: New York-Newark-Edison, NY-NJ-PA	57.0%
62: Ogden-Clearfield, UT	63.0%
63: Oklahoma City, OK	64.0%
64: Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA	72.0%
65: Orlando, FL	65.0%
66: Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA	61.0%
67: Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL	63.0%
68: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD	66.0%
69: Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ	58.0%
70: Pittsburgh, PA	65.0%
71: Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA	63.0%
72: Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY	58.0%
73: Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA	68.0%
74: Provo-Orem, UT	48.0%
75: Raleigh-Cary, NC	62.0%
76: Richmond, VA	71.0%
77: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA	56.0%
78: Rochester, NY	70.0%
79: Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA	62.0%
80: Salt Lake City, UT	63.0%
81: San Antonio, TX	61.0%
82: San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA	58.0%
83: San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA	61.0%
84: San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA	57.0%
85: Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice, FL	66.0%
86: Scranton-Wilkes-Barre, PA	67.0%
87: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA	62.0%
88: Springfield, MA	67.0%
89: St. Louis, MO-IL	70.0%
90: Stockton, CA	57.0%
91: Syracuse, NY	70.0%
92: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL	66.0%
93: Toledo, OH	69.0%
94: Tucson, AZ	60.0%
95: Tulsa, OK	60.0%
96: Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC	67.0%
97: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV	67.0%
98: Wichita, KS	67.0%
99: Worcester, MA	66.0%
100: Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA	67.0%

Definition: Share of Women Aged 16+ With Own Children Under 18 at Home in the Labor Force

Source: 2000 Census Summary File 3

Back to top