Poor Childrens' Exposure to Neighborhoods with Crowded Housing by Race/Ethnicity

Year: 2000; Race/Ethnicity: All; Ordered: alphabetically; Region: 100 Largest MSAs

Why don’t my MSA choices always appear consistently across all reports?

Scale Range: 0.9% – 44.2%

1: Akron, OH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.8%
Hispanic	–
Black	2.6%
Asian	–

2: Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.7%
Hispanic	3.3%
Black	3.8%
Asian	–

3: Albuquerque, NM	Value
Non-Hispanic White	6.1%
Hispanic	10.6%
Black	–
Asian	–

4: Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.2%
Hispanic	6.8%
Black	5.3%
Asian	–

5: Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.4%
Hispanic	12.6%
Black	10.3%
Asian	11.2%

6: Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.4%
Hispanic	–
Black	6.0%
Asian	–

7: Austin-Round Rock, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	7.2%
Hispanic	15.6%
Black	15.3%
Asian	10.4%

8: Bakersfield, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	12.8%
Hispanic	31.2%
Black	22.5%
Asian	24.4%

9: Baltimore-Towson, MD	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.8%
Hispanic	4.3%
Black	6.0%
Asian	3.8%

10: Baton Rouge, LA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.8%
Hispanic	–
Black	8.4%
Asian	–

11: Birmingham-Hoover, AL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.4%
Hispanic	3.8%
Black	4.8%
Asian	–

12: Boise City-Nampa, ID	Value
Non-Hispanic White	5.6%
Hispanic	8.7%
Black	–
Asian	–

13: Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.6%
Hispanic	10.8%
Black	9.6%
Asian	10.3%

14: Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.9%
Hispanic	11.8%
Black	10.4%
Asian	6.0%

15: Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Tonawanda, NY	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.2%
Hispanic	5.6%
Black	4.1%
Asian	–

16: Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.5%
Hispanic	9.0%
Black	10.5%
Asian	–

17: Charleston-North Charleston, SC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.8%
Hispanic	–
Black	5.4%
Asian	–

18: Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.7%
Hispanic	9.0%
Black	8.1%
Asian	6.7%

19: Chattanooga, TN-GA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.3%
Hispanic	–
Black	4.8%
Asian	–

20: Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	5.8%
Hispanic	19.0%
Black	12.2%
Asian	12.5%

21: Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.4%
Hispanic	3.5%
Black	4.4%
Asian	3.5%

22: Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.6%
Hispanic	4.9%
Black	3.8%
Asian	3.0%

23: Colorado Springs, CO	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.5%
Hispanic	6.8%
Black	6.6%
Asian	–

24: Columbia, SC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.1%
Hispanic	–
Black	4.9%
Asian	–

25: Columbus, OH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.5%
Hispanic	5.1%
Black	4.9%
Asian	4.0%

26: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	8.6%
Hispanic	23.3%
Black	15.3%
Asian	13.3%

27: Dayton, OH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.0%
Hispanic	–
Black	3.0%
Asian	–

28: Denver-Aurora, CO	Value
Non-Hispanic White	6.2%
Hispanic	15.6%
Black	13.0%
Asian	8.8%

29: Des Moines, IA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.0%
Hispanic	7.9%
Black	9.4%
Asian	–

30: Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	5.3%
Hispanic	9.9%
Black	8.5%
Asian	8.6%

31: El Paso, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	13.8%
Hispanic	18.9%
Black	14.7%
Asian	–

32: Fresno, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	17.7%
Hispanic	31.3%
Black	25.0%
Asian	29.6%

33: Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.6%
Hispanic	10.8%
Black	7.2%
Asian	–

34: Greensboro-High Point, NC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.3%
Hispanic	6.0%
Black	5.8%
Asian	–

35: Greenville, SC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.9%
Hispanic	–
Black	3.6%
Asian	–

36: Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.8%
Hispanic	6.3%
Black	5.8%
Asian	–

37: Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.8%
Hispanic	10.4%
Black	8.8%
Asian	2.9%

38: Honolulu, HI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	13.6%
Hispanic	21.8%
Black	14.7%
Asian	27.2%

39: Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	10.4%
Hispanic	22.8%
Black	16.4%
Asian	16.1%

40: Indianapolis, IN	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.0%
Hispanic	5.5%
Black	5.5%
Asian	–

41: Jackson, MS	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.8%
Hispanic	–
Black	9.6%
Asian	–

42: Jacksonville, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.4%
Hispanic	5.2%
Black	7.5%
Asian	6.1%

43: Kansas City, MO-KS	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.5%
Hispanic	9.2%
Black	7.1%
Asian	6.8%

44: Knoxville, TN	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.1%
Hispanic	–
Black	3.4%
Asian	–

45: Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	6.1%
Hispanic	9.2%
Black	7.9%
Asian	–

46: Lancaster, PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.8%
Hispanic	6.4%
Black	–
Asian	–

47: Las Vegas-Paradise, NV	Value
Non-Hispanic White	11.2%
Hispanic	23.1%
Black	18.3%
Asian	11.6%

48: Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.3%
Hispanic	–
Black	6.0%
Asian	–

49: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	21.0%
Hispanic	44.2%
Black	34.2%
Asian	32.4%

50: Louisville, KY-IN	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.7%
Hispanic	4.2%
Black	5.3%
Asian	–

51: Madison, WI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.1%
Hispanic	–
Black	6.9%
Asian	–

52: McAllen-Edinburg-Pharr, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	25.3%
Hispanic	29.2%
Black	–
Asian	–

53: Memphis, TN-MS-AR	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.0%
Hispanic	7.4%
Black	8.9%
Asian	–

54: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	13.1%
Hispanic	23.0%
Black	22.0%
Asian	13.0%

55: Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.7%
Hispanic	14.2%
Black	9.2%
Asian	10.8%

56: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.8%
Hispanic	10.2%
Black	13.1%
Asian	15.4%

57: Modesto, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	16.9%
Hispanic	22.8%
Black	–
Asian	23.9%

58: Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro, TN	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.3%
Hispanic	6.0%
Black	6.9%
Asian	5.1%

59: New Haven-Milford, CT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.8%
Hispanic	7.6%
Black	6.7%
Asian	–

60: New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	5.0%
Hispanic	7.7%
Black	11.9%
Asian	11.8%

61: New York-Newark-Edison, NY-NJ-PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	13.0%
Hispanic	21.9%
Black	17.4%
Asian	20.6%

62: Ogden-Clearfield, UT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	6.1%
Hispanic	11.3%
Black	–
Asian	–

63: Oklahoma City, OK	Value
Non-Hispanic White	5.1%
Hispanic	10.7%
Black	6.3%
Asian	5.6%

64: Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.6%
Hispanic	8.6%
Black	6.6%
Asian	–

65: Orlando, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	5.6%
Hispanic	9.7%
Black	10.7%
Asian	8.6%

66: Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	10.5%
Hispanic	32.6%
Black	–
Asian	23.5%

67: Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.9%
Hispanic	3.9%
Black	6.1%
Asian	–

68: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.6%
Hispanic	12.7%
Black	7.6%
Asian	8.2%

69: Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ	Value
Non-Hispanic White	10.6%
Hispanic	24.4%
Black	21.4%
Asian	14.3%

70: Pittsburgh, PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	1.2%
Hispanic	1.7%
Black	2.6%
Asian	1.6%

71: Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	6.0%
Hispanic	9.5%
Black	7.6%
Asian	6.8%

72: Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY	Value
Non-Hispanic White	16.9%
Hispanic	10.7%
Black	12.0%
Asian	–

73: Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.2%
Hispanic	9.2%
Black	7.8%
Asian	8.3%

74: Provo-Orem, UT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	8.3%
Hispanic	11.1%
Black	–
Asian	–

75: Raleigh-Cary, NC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.0%
Hispanic	4.9%
Black	6.0%
Asian	4.4%

76: Richmond, VA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.4%
Hispanic	5.6%
Black	5.3%
Asian	–

77: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	14.4%
Hispanic	26.0%
Black	21.3%
Asian	19.2%

78: Rochester, NY	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.1%
Hispanic	5.0%
Black	4.9%
Asian	3.4%

79: Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	11.2%
Hispanic	16.9%
Black	17.2%
Asian	19.9%

80: Salt Lake City, UT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	7.1%
Hispanic	13.4%
Black	–
Asian	11.1%

81: San Antonio, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	8.4%
Hispanic	16.1%
Black	12.0%
Asian	9.3%

82: San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	12.0%
Hispanic	30.5%
Black	27.8%
Asian	26.7%

83: San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	10.6%
Hispanic	25.8%
Black	20.7%
Asian	20.9%

84: San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	13.7%
Hispanic	31.6%
Black	23.7%
Asian	26.2%

85: Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.6%
Hispanic	12.5%
Black	12.2%
Asian	–

86: Scranton-Wilkes-Barre, PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	0.9%
Hispanic	–
Black	–
Asian	–

87: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	6.1%
Hispanic	9.1%
Black	9.9%
Asian	10.5%

88: Springfield, MA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.1%
Hispanic	9.3%
Black	7.0%
Asian	–

89: St. Louis, MO-IL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.6%
Hispanic	4.5%
Black	6.0%
Asian	4.2%

90: Stockton, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	15.7%
Hispanic	22.8%
Black	23.3%
Asian	25.3%

91: Syracuse, NY	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.0%
Hispanic	4.6%
Black	4.8%
Asian	–

92: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.5%
Hispanic	10.9%
Black	10.8%
Asian	5.8%

93: Toledo, OH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.0%
Hispanic	2.8%
Black	3.7%
Asian	–

94: Tucson, AZ	Value
Non-Hispanic White	8.3%
Hispanic	16.8%
Black	13.5%
Asian	–

95: Tulsa, OK	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.2%
Hispanic	7.1%
Black	7.1%
Asian	–

96: Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.5%
Hispanic	4.9%
Black	6.4%
Asian	4.4%

97: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV	Value
Non-Hispanic White	4.2%
Hispanic	15.5%
Black	12.2%
Asian	10.3%

98: Wichita, KS	Value
Non-Hispanic White	3.9%
Hispanic	9.1%
Black	6.8%
Asian	–

99: Worcester, MA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.8%
Hispanic	7.5%
Black	5.6%
Asian	5.9%

100: Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	2.0%
Hispanic	–
Black	2.6%
Asian	–

Definition: This indicator provides the share of occupied housing units that are crowded in the neighborhood where the average poor child of different racial/ethnic groups lives. For instance, if the value is 10% for poor Hispanic children, this statistic is interpreted as "The average poor Hispanic child in this metro area lives in a neighborhood where 10% of occupied housing units are crowded."

Notes: Children defined as under 18. Crowding defined as more than one person per room. Excludes metro areas with less than 5,000 child population of the specified racial/ethnic group.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census, Summary File 3 accessed through the Neighborhood Change Database.