Poor Childrens' Exposure to Neighborhood Homeownership Rate by Race/Ethnicity

Year: 2000; Race/Ethnicity: All; Ordered: alphabetically; Region: 100 Largest MSAs

Why don’t my MSA choices always appear consistently across all reports?

Scale Range: 17.8% – 80.2%

1: Akron, OH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	65.3%
Hispanic	–
Black	51.6%
Asian	–

2: Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY	Value
Non-Hispanic White	61.1%
Hispanic	38.6%
Black	32.4%
Asian	–

3: Albuquerque, NM	Value
Non-Hispanic White	69.0%
Hispanic	65.8%
Black	–
Asian	–

4: Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ	Value
Non-Hispanic White	67.1%
Hispanic	45.7%
Black	51.1%
Asian	–

5: Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	73.7%
Hispanic	47.9%
Black	47.1%
Asian	52.2%

6: Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	72.8%
Hispanic	–
Black	60.5%
Asian	–

7: Austin-Round Rock, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	66.1%
Hispanic	48.7%
Black	49.3%
Asian	38.9%

8: Bakersfield, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	59.5%
Hispanic	51.8%
Black	48.7%
Asian	60.6%

9: Baltimore-Towson, MD	Value
Non-Hispanic White	66.7%
Hispanic	52.4%
Black	44.7%
Asian	55.9%

10: Baton Rouge, LA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	77.0%
Hispanic	–
Black	60.9%
Asian	–

11: Birmingham-Hoover, AL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	80.2%
Hispanic	64.2%
Black	55.9%
Asian	–

12: Boise City-Nampa, ID	Value
Non-Hispanic White	69.9%
Hispanic	66.7%
Black	–
Asian	–

13: Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	60.3%
Hispanic	30.2%
Black	31.6%
Asian	36.1%

14: Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	69.2%
Hispanic	31.5%
Black	35.3%
Asian	58.0%

15: Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Tonawanda, NY	Value
Non-Hispanic White	60.9%
Hispanic	36.3%
Black	41.1%
Asian	–

16: Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	75.1%
Hispanic	64.1%
Black	46.1%
Asian	–

17: Charleston-North Charleston, SC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	66.5%
Hispanic	–
Black	58.4%
Asian	–

18: Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	70.9%
Hispanic	51.3%
Black	50.6%
Asian	58.8%

19: Chattanooga, TN-GA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	72.2%
Hispanic	–
Black	43.0%
Asian	–

20: Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	69.7%
Hispanic	45.8%
Black	38.2%
Asian	49.5%

21: Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN	Value
Non-Hispanic White	65.3%
Hispanic	49.6%
Black	33.2%
Asian	57.9%

22: Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	64.2%
Hispanic	47.9%
Black	41.6%
Asian	59.2%

23: Colorado Springs, CO	Value
Non-Hispanic White	62.4%
Hispanic	53.0%
Black	50.2%
Asian	–

24: Columbia, SC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	76.1%
Hispanic	–
Black	59.1%
Asian	–

25: Columbus, OH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	60.4%
Hispanic	40.2%
Black	42.9%
Asian	49.8%

26: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	66.0%
Hispanic	47.4%
Black	48.0%
Asian	47.9%

27: Dayton, OH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	61.4%
Hispanic	–
Black	52.1%
Asian	–

28: Denver-Aurora, CO	Value
Non-Hispanic White	66.4%
Hispanic	51.4%
Black	52.2%
Asian	58.8%

29: Des Moines, IA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	70.4%
Hispanic	57.5%
Black	52.0%
Asian	–

30: Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	71.6%
Hispanic	54.8%
Black	52.0%
Asian	59.1%

31: El Paso, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	58.0%
Hispanic	61.6%
Black	54.1%
Asian	–

32: Fresno, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	53.5%
Hispanic	46.2%
Black	43.0%
Asian	41.1%

33: Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	73.6%
Hispanic	58.5%
Black	50.7%
Asian	–

34: Greensboro-High Point, NC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	72.5%
Hispanic	58.0%
Black	47.7%
Asian	–

35: Greenville, SC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	73.2%
Hispanic	–
Black	58.7%
Asian	–

36: Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	72.0%
Hispanic	47.9%
Black	47.1%
Asian	–

37: Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	60.3%
Hispanic	25.5%
Black	31.3%
Asian	60.8%

38: Honolulu, HI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	40.3%
Hispanic	46.8%
Black	17.8%
Asian	44.0%

39: Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	67.2%
Hispanic	49.9%
Black	49.4%
Asian	53.6%

40: Indianapolis, IN	Value
Non-Hispanic White	65.7%
Hispanic	48.7%
Black	49.5%
Asian	–

41: Jackson, MS	Value
Non-Hispanic White	74.9%
Hispanic	–
Black	60.7%
Asian	–

42: Jacksonville, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	70.3%
Hispanic	63.1%
Black	58.1%
Asian	54.8%

43: Kansas City, MO-KS	Value
Non-Hispanic White	68.1%
Hispanic	56.7%
Black	52.7%
Asian	50.5%

44: Knoxville, TN	Value
Non-Hispanic White	68.8%
Hispanic	–
Black	46.1%
Asian	–

45: Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	71.7%
Hispanic	69.6%
Black	60.7%
Asian	–

46: Lancaster, PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	72.5%
Hispanic	46.5%
Black	–
Asian	–

47: Las Vegas-Paradise, NV	Value
Non-Hispanic White	54.9%
Hispanic	40.8%
Black	45.1%
Asian	53.3%

48: Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR	Value
Non-Hispanic White	70.2%
Hispanic	–
Black	52.6%
Asian	–

49: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	49.2%
Hispanic	35.4%
Black	37.3%
Asian	43.2%

50: Louisville, KY-IN	Value
Non-Hispanic White	68.0%
Hispanic	55.1%
Black	43.5%
Asian	–

51: Madison, WI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	65.8%
Hispanic	–
Black	43.8%
Asian	–

52: McAllen-Edinburg-Pharr, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	72.4%
Hispanic	75.6%
Black	–
Asian	–

53: Memphis, TN-MS-AR	Value
Non-Hispanic White	72.3%
Hispanic	62.0%
Black	53.1%
Asian	–

54: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	63.9%
Hispanic	52.3%
Black	49.5%
Asian	61.8%

55: Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	59.8%
Hispanic	37.0%
Black	37.1%
Asian	41.0%

56: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI	Value
Non-Hispanic White	73.8%
Hispanic	53.1%
Black	49.8%
Asian	49.9%

57: Modesto, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	57.5%
Hispanic	56.6%
Black	–
Asian	54.9%

58: Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro, TN	Value
Non-Hispanic White	69.1%
Hispanic	51.8%
Black	41.4%
Asian	51.4%

59: New Haven-Milford, CT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	60.1%
Hispanic	33.2%
Black	33.1%
Asian	–

60: New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	70.0%
Hispanic	56.4%
Black	43.4%
Asian	56.7%

61: New York-Newark-Edison, NY-NJ-PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	47.7%
Hispanic	19.1%
Black	22.1%
Asian	32.0%

62: Ogden-Clearfield, UT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	71.3%
Hispanic	56.3%
Black	–
Asian	–

63: Oklahoma City, OK	Value
Non-Hispanic White	64.5%
Hispanic	52.2%
Black	52.6%
Asian	51.6%

64: Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	65.6%
Hispanic	53.5%
Black	52.9%
Asian	–

65: Orlando, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	69.4%
Hispanic	58.1%
Black	51.0%
Asian	59.3%

66: Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	66.5%
Hispanic	52.5%
Black	–
Asian	57.2%

67: Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	73.0%
Hispanic	65.4%
Black	59.2%
Asian	–

68: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD	Value
Non-Hispanic White	71.6%
Hispanic	55.8%
Black	55.4%
Asian	62.4%

69: Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ	Value
Non-Hispanic White	64.5%
Hispanic	52.5%
Black	51.9%
Asian	53.8%

70: Pittsburgh, PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	71.2%
Hispanic	62.6%
Black	46.8%
Asian	56.9%

71: Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	61.9%
Hispanic	55.6%
Black	55.5%
Asian	59.1%

72: Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY	Value
Non-Hispanic White	51.8%
Hispanic	41.6%
Black	31.2%
Asian	–

73: Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	50.1%
Hispanic	32.2%
Black	33.2%
Asian	34.7%

74: Provo-Orem, UT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	65.6%
Hispanic	53.5%
Black	–
Asian	–

75: Raleigh-Cary, NC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	72.6%
Hispanic	62.6%
Black	55.9%
Asian	57.3%

76: Richmond, VA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	73.8%
Hispanic	48.8%
Black	48.8%
Asian	–

77: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	63.4%
Hispanic	55.2%
Black	54.2%
Asian	58.1%

78: Rochester, NY	Value
Non-Hispanic White	67.3%
Hispanic	40.2%
Black	38.8%
Asian	52.4%

79: Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	56.7%
Hispanic	51.0%
Black	50.6%
Asian	52.2%

80: Salt Lake City, UT	Value
Non-Hispanic White	69.5%
Hispanic	56.4%
Black	–
Asian	65.3%

81: San Antonio, TX	Value
Non-Hispanic White	69.0%
Hispanic	62.4%
Black	57.9%
Asian	65.9%

82: San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	54.0%
Hispanic	36.4%
Black	37.8%
Asian	41.4%

83: San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	60.4%
Hispanic	43.2%
Black	40.0%
Asian	44.8%

84: San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	60.8%
Hispanic	50.2%
Black	54.3%
Asian	56.3%

85: Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	72.3%
Hispanic	56.9%
Black	54.9%
Asian	–

86: Scranton-Wilkes-Barre, PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	66.6%
Hispanic	–
Black	–
Asian	–

87: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	61.1%
Hispanic	49.5%
Black	48.4%
Asian	51.6%

88: Springfield, MA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	58.5%
Hispanic	30.5%
Black	39.8%
Asian	–

89: St. Louis, MO-IL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	73.0%
Hispanic	62.0%
Black	52.2%
Asian	60.9%

90: Stockton, CA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	56.7%
Hispanic	50.8%
Black	49.7%
Asian	45.9%

91: Syracuse, NY	Value
Non-Hispanic White	64.6%
Hispanic	36.5%
Black	37.0%
Asian	–

92: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL	Value
Non-Hispanic White	71.8%
Hispanic	60.8%
Black	51.1%
Asian	62.1%

93: Toledo, OH	Value
Non-Hispanic White	67.0%
Hispanic	55.0%
Black	48.0%
Asian	–

94: Tucson, AZ	Value
Non-Hispanic White	58.2%
Hispanic	56.7%
Black	46.4%
Asian	–

95: Tulsa, OK	Value
Non-Hispanic White	68.3%
Hispanic	52.2%
Black	52.6%
Asian	–

96: Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC	Value
Non-Hispanic White	62.8%
Hispanic	49.6%
Black	44.1%
Asian	56.1%

97: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV	Value
Non-Hispanic White	71.6%
Hispanic	47.3%
Black	41.3%
Asian	56.3%

98: Wichita, KS	Value
Non-Hispanic White	67.0%
Hispanic	51.8%
Black	48.5%
Asian	–

99: Worcester, MA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	56.5%
Hispanic	29.5%
Black	35.6%
Asian	32.0%

100: Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA	Value
Non-Hispanic White	71.5%
Hispanic	–
Black	56.9%
Asian	–

Definition: This indicator provides the homeownership rate in the neighborhood where the average poor child of different racial/ethnic groups lives. For instance, if the value is 60% for poor Hispanic children, this statistic is interpreted as "The average poor Hispanic child in this metro area lives in a neighborhood where the homeownership rate is 60%."

Notes: Poverty rates defined as of 1999. Children are those under 18. Excludes metro areas with less than 5,000 children of the specified racial/ethnic group.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Census, Summary File 3.